Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31


90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched February 2012
- Succeeded the Samsung NX100
- Newer Model is Samsung NX210

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.

The Tough-3000 was brought out 3 years prior to the NX200 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the NX200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung NX200
Tough-3000 | NX200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Olympus Tough-3000
NX200 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 26 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung NX200
Tough-3000 | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the NX200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and NX200 is 94 and 90 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The picture below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and NX200.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX200 will provide more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung NX200 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 223 gr (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $0 | $818 |