Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX3000
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Revealed May 2014
- Old Model is Samsung NX2000
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung NX3000, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and NX3000 (APS-C) have different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Tough-3000 was revealed 5 years prior to the NX3000 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the NX3000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Samsung NX3000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung NX3000
Tough-3000 | NX3000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus Tough-3000
NX3000 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2014 | January 2010 | More modern by 53 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung NX3000
Tough-3000 | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung NX3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the NX3000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and NX3000 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and NX3000.
As you have seen, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX3000 will offer you more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung NX3000 |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 461k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $897 |