Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung ST95
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung ST95, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was introduced 12 months before the ST95 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the ST95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Samsung ST95. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung ST95
| Tough-3000 | ST95 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| ST95 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 | January 2010 | More modern by 12 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung ST95
| Tough-3000 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Samsung ST95 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the ST95.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and ST95 is 94 and 99 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and ST95.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can anticipate the Samsung ST95 to offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung ST95 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $145 |