Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Samsung WB35F front
Portability
93
Imaging
40
Features
33
Overall
37

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Also Known as mju Tough 3000
Samsung WB35F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Overview

Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Tough-3000 was released 5 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung WB35F

 Tough-3000 WB35F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus Tough-3000

 WB35F Tough-3000 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2010Newer by 48 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB35F

 Tough-3000 WB35F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing2.7"2.7"Equivalent screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).

Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the WB35F.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and WB35F.

To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography advice
Samsung WB35F Portrait photography advice
21
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
37
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography factors
Samsung WB35F Street photography factors
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
62
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB35F Sports photography factors
36
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Travel photography camera
61
weather sealing
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
70
lighter than competition (194g)
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
long reach (288mm)
does not have Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB35F as a Landscape photography camera
35
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
no manual exposure
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
43
has manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging information
Samsung WB35F Vlogging information
28
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
31
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (194g)
slow max aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB35F
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Samsung WB35F
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Samsung WB35F
Otherwise known as mju Tough 3000 -
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-01-07 2014-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/3.1-6.3
Macro focusing distance 2cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 159 grams (0.35 lb) 194 grams (0.43 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $0 $130