Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB35F, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe Tough-3000 was released 5 years prior to the WB35F which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung WB35F
| Tough-3000 | WB35F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus Tough-3000
| WB35F | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 48 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB35F
| Tough-3000 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with exterior measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB35F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the WB35F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and WB35F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading specifications. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and WB35F.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Samsung WB35F to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Samsung WB35F |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $130 |