Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
39
Features
51
Overall
43

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Tough-3000 was announced 4 years earlier than the WB800F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Tough-3000 matches up against the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

				

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Samsung WB800F

 Tough-3000 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus Tough-3000

 WB800F Tough-3000 
RevealedJanuary 2013January 2010Fresher by 36 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB800F

 Tough-3000 WB800F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus Tough-3000 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the WB800F.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and WB800F.

As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB800F to result in more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Portrait photography camera
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
43
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography info
Samsung WB800F Street photography info
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (218 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Sports photography camera
36
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
52
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Travel photography camera
61
environment sealing
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
69
lighter than average (218g)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (23mm)
long zoom (483mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography highlights
35
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
49
focusing manually
pretty wide (23mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging advice
Samsung WB800F Vlogging advice
28
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
35
pretty wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (218g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Samsung WB800F
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Samsung WB800F
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Samsung WB800F
Also called as mju Tough 3000 -
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-01-07 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 159 grams (0.35 lb) 218 grams (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $300