Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
86 Imaging
43 Features
28 Overall
37
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2009
- Replacement is Sigma DP2s
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and DP2 (5MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and DP2 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Tough-3000 was launched 4 months after the DP2 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Tough-3000 grades versus the DP2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sigma DP2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sigma DP2
| Tough-3000 | DP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| DP2 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sigma DP2
| Tough-3000 | DP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 |  | September 2009 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Tough-3000 and the DP2.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and DP2 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The pic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and DP2.
All in all, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus Tough-3000 will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sigma DP2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sigma DP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sigma DP2 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-01-07 | 2009-09-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 41mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 159g (0.35 lb) | 280g (0.62 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $0 | $649 |