Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A9 II
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Replaced the Sony A9
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A9 II Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony A9 II, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and A9 II (Full frame) posses different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Tough-3000 was revealed 10 years prior to the A9 II and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the A9 II with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A9 II Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The full galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony A9 II
Tough-3000 | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Olympus Tough-3000
A9 II | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | January 2010 | Fresher by 118 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1440k | 230k | Sharper display (+1210k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A9 II
Tough-3000 | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outside measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony A9 II has measurements of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony A9 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 against the A9 II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and A9 II is 94 and 62 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and A9 II.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A9 II will result in more detail because of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Alternative name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2019-10-03 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,440 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lb) | 678 gr (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 690 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Launch pricing | $0 | $4,498 |