Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
57 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 849g - 143 x 104 x 76mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Sony A99
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and A99 II (42MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and A99 II (Full frame) have different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Tough-3000 was introduced 7 years prior to the A99 II which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A99 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Tough-3000 grades against the A99 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Alpha A99 II. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony A99 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony A99 II
Tough-3000 | A99 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A99 II over the Olympus Tough-3000
A99 II | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | January 2010 | Newer by 81 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A99 II
Tough-3000 | A99 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony A99 II has measurements of 143mm x 104mm x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") with a weight of 849 grams (1.87 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the A99 II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and A99 II is 94 and 57 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The picture below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and A99 II.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A99 II will offer greater detail using its extra 30 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A99 II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha A99 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha A99 II |
Alternate name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 42MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 399 |
Cross focus points | - | 79 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, redeye reduction, rear sync, high-speed sync, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 849 grams (1.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 143 x 104 x 76mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2317 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 490 images |
Battery format | - | NP-FM500H lithium-ion battery & charger |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS Duo slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
Pricing at release | $0 | $3,198 |