Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Announced July 2008
- Later Model is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was released 18 months later than the A200 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Tough-3000 grades vs the A200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony A200
Tough-3000 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2010 | ![]() | July 2008 | Fresher by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus Tough-3000
A200 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A200
Tough-3000 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 and the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc1da/dc1daa3ed24073917a9aa6afc2660b0699b337f9" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and A200 is 94 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e80e4/e80e447cf74bb98dc3388b2c74c0089452806e2c" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The photograph here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and A200.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus Tough-3000 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Tough-3000 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11acd/11acde30e8bf422832e6364d3ce20540e6394b7e" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1c91/e1c91ea3c92307b4764fcf71e60bc056fe5b4f24" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Alternative name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $100 |