Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12c81/12c817401ce2f8957e577f0ee287d1054036861a" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front"
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released June 2008
- Updated by Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and the A350 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was announced 20 months after the A350 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Tough-3000 matches up against the A350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony A350
Tough-3000 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus Tough-3000
A350 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A350
Tough-3000 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the A350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c229/8c229c6118bf40e49a63d404747549304815829d" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and A350 is 94 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc398/bc398dda2bf4f3f448d3316120b3351120936c05" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The image underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and A350.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony A350 will give more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer Tough-3000 provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d544/2d544477c1f4fbda221b4c30f94ef696774d9a95" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dab1/4dab172f60800a73b62a5b21f5c4436945f08589" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Other name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2008-06-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) | 674 gr (1.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $600 |