Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7eddc/7eddc1de1900bdf7cc3907ab82968f90c4856591" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3N front Sony Alpha NEX-3N front"
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Launched February 2013
- Older Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Newer Model is Sony a5000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was manufactured 4 years before the NEX-3N and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Tough-3000 grades against the NEX-3N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony NEX-3N
Tough-3000 | NEX-3N |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus Tough-3000
NEX-3N | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 38 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony NEX-3N
Tough-3000 | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 features external measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the NEX-3N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2e3e/e2e3e18f4e3acd5bc5375ba9eaf556214d2f7602" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and NEX-3N is 94 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a4d/d3a4d277dabdd94289c66bc1c3607de226092293" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The visual here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and NEX-3N.
All in all, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Sony NEX-3N will render greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34822/34822f2be5b673d1092c06a198914bc558d569f2" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99b92/99b92d19b1d6c5441cd3b5bea31a204608ddef02" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 480 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $399 |