Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Launched February 2016
- Old Model is Sony A6000
- New Model is Sony A6500
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Tough-3000 was brought out 7 years before the A6300 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the A6300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Alpha a6300. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony A6300
Tough-3000 | A6300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus Tough-3000
A6300 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | January 2010 | More modern by 73 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A6300
Tough-3000 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 and the A6300.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and A6300 is 94 and 83 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and A6300.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Sony A6300 will deliver more detail having its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2016-02-03 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 404 gr (0.89 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $889 |