Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6500
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
81 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 453g - 120 x 67 x 53mm
- Revealed October 2016
- Superseded the Sony A6300
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6500 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony A6500, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and A6500 (24MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and A6500 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Tough-3000 was launched 7 years before the A6500 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the Tough-3000 scores vs the A6500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6500 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Alpha a6500. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony A6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony A6500
Tough-3000 | A6500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6500 over the Olympus Tough-3000
A6500 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2016 | January 2010 | More modern by 82 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony A6500
Tough-3000 | A6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers exterior dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony A6500 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony A6500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 against the A6500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and A6500 is 94 and 81 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The image here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and A6500.
All in all, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Tough-3000 because of its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Sony A6500 will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony A6500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha a6500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Alpha a6500 |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-01-07 | 2016-10-06 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1405 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $1,298 |