Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50
69 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 111 x 85 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Pentax and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the X90 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X90 was brought out 7 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Pentax X90 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the X90 grades versus the WG-50 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Pentax X90 & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Pentax X90 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax X90 over the Ricoh WG-50
X90 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Pentax X90
WG-50 | X90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | July 2010 | More modern by 83 months |
Common features in the Pentax X90 and Ricoh WG-50
X90 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Pentax X90 provides exterior measurements of 111mm x 85mm x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the X90 vs the WG-50.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the X90 and WG-50 is 69 and 91 respectively.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X90 and WG-50.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver more detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged X90 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Pentax X90 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Pentax X90 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Ricoh |
Model | Pentax X90 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2010-07-06 | 2017-05-24 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428g (0.94 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 85 x 110mm (4.4" x 3.3" x 4.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-L106 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $350 | $280 |