Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 front
Portability
67
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Released January 2010
  • Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
Sony H200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
  • Announced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony H200, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Tough-3000 was announced 4 years prior to the H200 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony H200

 Tough-3000 H200 

Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus Tough-3000

 H200 Tough-3000 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2010More recent by 36 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony H200

 Tough-3000 H200 
Manually focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither comes with Touch screen

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") with a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).

Compare the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony H200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 and the H200.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and H200 is 94 and 67 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and H200.

As you can tell, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Sony H200 to provide you with extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography highlights
Sony H200 Portrait photography highlights
21
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
37
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography factors
Sony H200 Street photography factors
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
45
built in image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competitors in class (530 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Sports photography camera
Sony H200 as a Sports photography camera
36
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
slow frames per second (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
47
excellent zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
provides tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery pack (240 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography information
Sony H200 Travel photography information
61
weather proofing
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
53
decent megapixels (20MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (633mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
not so great battery pack (240 per charge)
heavier than competitors in class (530g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Landscape photography highlights
Sony H200 Landscape photography highlights
35
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
40
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
manual focus not available
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
not so great battery pack (240 shots)
missing Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Vlogging camera
Sony H200 as a Vlogging camera
28
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic port
25
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic port
heavier than competitors in class (530g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony H200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony H200
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200
Also called as mju Tough 3000 -
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-01-07 2013-01-08
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3968 x 2976 5184 x 2920
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-633mm (26.4x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/3.1-5.9
Macro focusing range 2cm 20cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - ClearPhoto LCD display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 6.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 159 gr (0.35 pounds) 530 gr (1.17 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photos
Form of battery - AA
Battery ID - 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $0 $250