Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de6ae/de6ae63fb6c0ba8b5faf7516704c3c5c53608870" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Released July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony HX9V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and HX9V (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was released 18 months earlier than the HX9V making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the HX9V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The complete galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony HX9V
Tough-3000 | HX9V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus Tough-3000
HX9V | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 18 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony HX9V
Tough-3000 | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony HX9V has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony HX9V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Tough-3000 and the HX9V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84c55/84c55da517dd0cb6473032010bf809e7ae84a240" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and HX9V is 94 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81646/816460c200f8747f4a695ac42eed248470b9f3eb" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and HX9V.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Sony HX9V to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60988/60988fff873346f6f5adcfd1604b5ff5a9d57f20" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd69a/dd69a6dd15dbb03fee39be6259b8e0e222b817a3" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony HX9V Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $328 |