Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Released January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Revealed March 2016
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 II
- Newer Model is Sony RX10 IV
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Tough-3000 was manufactured 7 years prior to the RX10 III which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the RX10 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony RX10 III
Tough-3000 | RX10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus Tough-3000
RX10 III | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2016 | January 2010 | Newer by 75 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Crisper display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX10 III
Tough-3000 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Look at the Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Tough-3000 against the RX10 III.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and RX10 III is 94 and 53 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and RX10 III.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony RX10 III will result in more detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159g (0.35 lbs) | 1051g (2.32 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $0 | $1,398 |