Clicky

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA

Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
26
Overall
31
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) front
Portability
89
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs

Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 3000
Sony RX100 VA
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
  • 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
  • Launched July 2018
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX100 VA, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and RX100 VA (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") feature different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Tough-3000 was unveiled 9 years earlier than the RX100 VA and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the RX100 VA in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony RX100 VA

 Tough-3000 RX100 VA 

Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Olympus Tough-3000

 RX100 VA Tough-3000 
LaunchedJuly 2018January 2010Fresher by 103 months
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1229k230kSharper screen (+999k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX100 VA

 Tough-3000 RX100 VA 
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VA has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).

Check out the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX100 VA in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the RX100 VA.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and RX100 VA is 94 and 89 respectively.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA top view buttons comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and RX100 VA.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX100 VA will give more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA sensor size comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Portrait photography details
Sony RX100 VA Portrait photography details
21
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
66
focusing manually
above average flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
features face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
external flash not possible
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography information
Sony RX100 VA Street photography information
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
86
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
lighter than competitors (299g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Sports photography information
Sony RX100 VA Sports photography information
36
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
70
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
high max frames per second (24.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
features tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect AF
bad battery (220 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 Travel photography factors
Sony RX100 VA Travel photography factors
61
environment proofing
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
76
lighter than competitors (299 grams)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
rather wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse mode
bad battery (220 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus Tough-3000 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX100 VA as a Landscape photography camera
35
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
66
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
bad battery (220 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus Tough-3000
Vlogging with Sony RX100 VA
28
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone support
81
rather wide (24mm)
fast max aperture (f1.8)
selfie friendly display
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
lighter than competitors (299g)
missing external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX100 VA
 Olympus Stylus Tough-3000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A)
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A)
Other name mju Tough 3000 -
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-01-07 2018-07-13
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 64 125
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO - 80
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 315
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-70mm (2.9x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/1.8-2.8
Macro focusing distance 2cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.9 2.7
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.59x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames/s 24.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.00 m 10.20 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/2000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 159 grams (0.35 lbs) 299 grams (0.66 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $0 $998