Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
89 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched July 2018
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX100 VA, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and RX100 VA (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and RX100 VA (1") feature different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Tough-3000 was unveiled 9 years earlier than the RX100 VA and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the Tough-3000 scores versus the RX100 VA in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The full galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony RX100 VA
Tough-3000 | RX100 VA |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Olympus Tough-3000
RX100 VA | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2018 | January 2010 | Fresher by 103 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX100 VA
Tough-3000 | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VA has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Check out the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX100 VA in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Tough-3000 compared to the RX100 VA.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Tough-3000 and RX100 VA is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at specs. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Tough-3000 and RX100 VA.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Tough-3000 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sony RX100 VA will give more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Other name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2018-07-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 299 grams (0.66 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $0 | $998 |