Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R II
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
78 Imaging
76 Features
65 Overall
71
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Announced October 2015
- Succeeded the Sony RX1R
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R II Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony RX1R II, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) come with totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Tough-3000 was brought out 6 years prior to the RX1R II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Tough-3000 matches up versus the RX1R II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The entire galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery and Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony RX1R II
Tough-3000 | RX1R II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus Tough-3000
RX1R II | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2015 | January 2010 | Newer by 70 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony RX1R II
Tough-3000 | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 comes with outer dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony RX1R II in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the RX1R II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Tough-3000 and RX1R II is 94 and 78 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The pic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Tough-3000 and RX1R II.
All in all, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Tough-3000 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony RX1R II will provide you with extra detail having its extra 30 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Also Known as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2015-10-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 42 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 14cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) | 507 grams (1.12 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 97 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $3,300 |