Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony WX80
Portability
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
38 Overall
39
96 Imaging
40 Features
38 Overall
39
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony WX80 Key Specs
Olympus Tough-3000
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
Sony WX80
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-8.0) lens
- 124g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony WX80 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony WX80, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and WX80 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Tough-3000 was introduced 4 years earlier than the WX80 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the Tough-3000 grades versus the WX80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony WX80 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80. The whole galleries are available at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony WX80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony WX80
| Tough-3000 | WX80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX80 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| WX80 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 36 months |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony WX80
| Tough-3000 | WX80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony WX80 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus Tough-3000 offers external measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony WX80 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony WX80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the Tough-3000 vs the WX80.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and WX80 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony WX80 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Tough-3000 and WX80.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Sony WX80 to give you greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony WX80 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony WX80 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Street photography information
Sony WX80 Street photography information
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
lighter than others in class (124 grams)
screen is fixed
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Sports photography with Sony WX80
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Travel photography with Sony WX80
environment proofing
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others in class (124g)
provides touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus Tough-3000
Landscape photography with Sony WX80
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Olympus Tough-3000 Vlogging features
Sony WX80 Vlogging features
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (124 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony WX80 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 |
| Alternate name | mju Tough 3000 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-8.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $276 |