Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/791ae/791aebc8a3b37ba2887be6bf87ec90d5ae9b78ee" alt="Sony ZV-1 front Sony ZV-1 front"
88 Imaging
55 Features
86 Overall
67
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 294g - 105 x 60 x 44mm
- Released May 2020
- Replacement is Sony ZV-1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony ZV-1, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the Tough-3000 (12MP) and ZV-1 (20MP) and the Tough-3000 (1/2.3") and ZV-1 (1") offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Tough-3000 was revealed 11 years earlier than the ZV-1 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera and the Sony ZV-1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Tough-3000 grades versus the ZV-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 & Sony ZV-1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery & Sony ZV-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Sony ZV-1
Tough-3000 | ZV-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
ZV-1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2020 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 126 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus Tough-3000 and Sony ZV-1
Tough-3000 | ZV-1 |
---|
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus Tough-3000 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Sony ZV-1 has specifications of 105mm x 60mm x 44mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.7") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus Tough-3000 versus Sony ZV-1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Tough-3000 versus the ZV-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74235/74235eec703a578d16671c67fb6f5b84e99fbe37" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Tough-3000 and ZV-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a79a9/a79a980bad81b56541e17626c6f1456323318e97" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Tough-3000 and ZV-1.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Tough-3000 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony ZV-1 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older Tough-3000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb4fb/bb4fb1fecb2116d9b4211df7e47085e8e1d858c5" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 sensor size comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e75e3/e75e302a120aa183eee0fbc683bc7c9fb8f56c0f" alt="Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus Tough-3000 vs Sony ZV-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony ZV-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | Sony ZV-1 |
Also called as | mju Tough 3000 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-01-07 | 2020-05-27 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 24.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 24 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 159 grams (0.35 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") | 105 x 60 x 44mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $750 |