Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the 6000 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") boast different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 6000 was released 9 years prior to the ZS200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the 6000 grades against the ZS200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6000 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Panasonic ZS200
6000 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus 6000
ZS200 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | July 2009 | More modern by 104 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Panasonic ZS200
6000 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6000 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the 6000 versus the ZS200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6000 and ZS200 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specs. The image below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 6000 and ZS200.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6000 because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged 6000 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6000 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6000 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179 gr (0.39 pounds) | 340 gr (0.75 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $259 | $800 |