Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6000 was revealed 3 years before the WG-2 GPS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 6000 scores versus the WG-2 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The full galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| 6000 | WG-2 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus 6000
| WG-2 GPS | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
| 6000 | WG-2 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6000 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 GPS has proportions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the 6000 and the WG-2 GPS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6000 and WG-2 GPS is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The visual underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6000 and WG-2 GPS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-2 GPS to show more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older 6000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 6000 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179g (0.39 lb) | 198g (0.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $259 | $300 |
