Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6000 was brought out 6 years earlier than the WG-30 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the 6000 grades vs the WG-30 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Ricoh WG-30
| 6000 | WG-30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus 6000
| WG-30 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 64 months |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Ricoh WG-30
| 6000 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6000 comes with exterior dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the 6000 compared to the WG-30.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6000 and WG-30 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The picture underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6000 and WG-30.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to deliver extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged 6000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lb) | 192 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $259 | $428 |