Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-4
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus 6000 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 6000 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WG-4 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the 6000 scores against the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 and Ricoh WG-4. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Ricoh WG-4
| 6000 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus 6000
| WG-4 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | July 2009 | Fresher by 56 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Ricoh WG-4
| 6000 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6000 offers physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 6000 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the 6000 and the WG-4.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6000 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 6000 and WG-4.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 to produce more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older 6000 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179g (0.39 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $259 | $330 |