Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-6
94 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
89 Imaging
46 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus 6000 and Ricoh WG-6, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6000 was released 9 years earlier than the WG-6 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the 6000 matches up versus the WG-6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Ricoh WG-6. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Ricoh WG-6
| 6000 | WG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus 6000
| WG-6 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 105 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Ricoh WG-6
| 6000 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6000 enjoys outside dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-6 has measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6000 and Ricoh WG-6 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the 6000 compared to the WG-6.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6000 and WG-6 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The visual below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6000 and WG-6.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-6 to show more detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The older 6000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 6000 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lb) | 246 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $259 | $271 |