Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus 6000 versus Sony NEX-3N, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the 6000 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 6000 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the NEX-3N and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the 6000 matches up vs the NEX-3N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Sony NEX-3N
| 6000 | NEX-3N |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus 6000
| NEX-3N | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Sony NEX-3N
| 6000 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus 6000 has physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6000 versus Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the 6000 and the NEX-3N.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 6000 and NEX-3N is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 6000 and NEX-3N.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 6000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony NEX-3N will produce extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older 6000 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Also called as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2013-02-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lb) | 269 grams (0.59 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 480 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $259 | $399 |