Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Released February 2013
- Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus 6000 versus Sony NEX-3N, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the 6000 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe 6000 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the NEX-3N and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the 6000 matches up vs the NEX-3N with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6000 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Sony NEX-3N
| 6000 | NEX-3N |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus 6000
| NEX-3N | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Sony NEX-3N
| 6000 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus 6000 has physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6000 versus Sony NEX-3N in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the 6000 and the NEX-3N.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 6000 and NEX-3N is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 6000 and NEX-3N.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 6000 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony NEX-3N will produce extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older 6000 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus 6000 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Also called as | mju Tough 6000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2013-02-25 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 50 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lb) | 269 grams (0.59 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 480 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $259 | $399 |