Clicky

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300

Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
51
Overall
47

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus 6000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju Tough 6000
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Revealed February 2013
  • Old Model is Sony HX200V
  • Refreshed by Sony HX400V
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus 6000 and Sony HX300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the 6000 (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 6000 was manufactured 4 years before the HX300 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the 6000 scores against the HX300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Sony HX300

 6000 HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus 6000

 HX300 6000 
RevealedFebruary 2013July 2009More modern by 44 months
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 6000 and Sony HX300

 6000 HX300 
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6000 has got exterior dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") having a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus 6000 and Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the 6000 and the HX300.

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6000 and HX300 is 94 and 63 respectively.

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6000 and HX300.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony HX300 to resolve extra detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged 6000 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 6000 Portrait photography information
Sony HX300 Portrait photography information
19
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
43
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus 6000 Street photography advice
Sony HX300 Street photography advice
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
50
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competitors in class (623g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus 6000 as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Sports photography camera
33
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
has tracking focus
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 6000
Travel photography with Sony HX300
61
environment proof
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
54
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (623 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 6000 Landscape photography advice
Sony HX300 Landscape photography advice
35
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
49
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 6000
Vlogging with Sony HX300
28
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic port
25
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
missing mic support
heavier than competitors in class (623 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus 6000 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6000 and Sony HX300
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6000Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Otherwise known as mju Tough 6000 -
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-07-01 2013-02-20
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 50 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-102mm (3.6x) 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8-6.3
Macro focus range 2cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Features
Min shutter speed 1/4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 179 grams (0.39 pounds) 623 grams (1.37 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage type xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal -
Card slots One One
Cost at release $259 $339