Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic ZS200
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Launched February 2018
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus 6010 and Panasonic ZS200, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the 6010 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 6010 was introduced 9 years prior to the ZS200 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the 6010 matches up versus the ZS200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Panasonic ZS200
6010 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus 6010
ZS200 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | July 2009 | More modern by 104 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Panasonic ZS200
6010 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 6010 features physical dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6010 and Panasonic ZS200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the 6010 and the ZS200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6010 and ZS200 is 94 and 86 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through technical specs. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6010 and ZS200.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 6010 with its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 6010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 6010 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-17 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50C | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $0 | $800 |