Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3be10/3be1075d35d6ec5ee027d640297ca7ce28c3fabb" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3e2/ab3e2b95d505b4b0ff0bfe0dc0d284b98f4a2d41" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
- Launched October 2009
- Updated by Panasonic GF2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the 6010 (12MP) and the GF1 (12MP) is pretty close but the 6010 (1/2.3") and GF1 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The 6010 was unveiled 2 months prior to the GF1 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the 6010 matches up against the GF1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 6010 Gallery and Panasonic GF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Panasonic GF1
6010 | GF1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus 6010
GF1 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Panasonic GF1
6010 | GF1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | ![]() | October 2009 | Same generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6010 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Panasonic GF1 has measurements of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the 6010 against the GF1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afcd0/afcd047ea5598af1ab611d13b924a21a6126dc73" alt="Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 6010 and GF1 is 94 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99fbe/99fbe43b5bd72ef89200d6c23a3ddd521bcb6096" alt="Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The pic here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 6010 and GF1.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The 6010 features the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF more difficult.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f89de/f89deb16c241a9389684154f7c2c13fb7853e9c9" alt="Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dc2/a0dc2e9650a121f1bc5b549cdc968ed268480ed4" alt="Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus 6010 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-07-17 | 2009-10-14 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) | 385 grams (0.85 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 513 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50C | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $0 | $400 |