Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3be10/3be1075d35d6ec5ee027d640297ca7ce28c3fabb" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47d9e/47d9e78f8a74376d0dbc30182b029c20ad373abd" alt="Ricoh G700SE front Ricoh G700SE front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Launched October 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus 6010 versus Ricoh G700SE, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 6010 (12MP) and the G700SE (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The 6010 was brought out 15 months before the G700SE which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the 6010 matches up against the G700SE in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 and Ricoh G700SE. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6010 Gallery and Ricoh G700SE Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Ricoh G700SE
6010 | G700SE |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G700SE over the Olympus 6010
G700SE | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2010 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 15 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Ricoh G700SE
6010 | G700SE | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6010 has external dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G700SE has proportions of 117mm x 68mm x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 307 grams (0.68 lbs).
See the Olympus 6010 versus Ricoh G700SE in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 6010 against the G700SE.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4c28/d4c28da48ca85a9b7b05417dddf2b4bb4e192594" alt="Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE size comparison Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the 6010 and G700SE is 94 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c756/1c756fe15972f213c7e62a8faf9801f40458164d" alt="Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE top view buttons comparison Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6010 and G700SE.
All in all, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of photos however you might want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged 6010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/836f5/836f57ae6eddb881c371a27044b830399d6cc474" alt="Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE sensor size comparison Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/581be/581befa3ec9da01b80e957f7566071a5bd6bbec3" alt="Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh G700SE Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Ricoh G700SE | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Ricoh G700SE |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-07-17 | 2010-10-13 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) | 307 grams (0.68 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50C | DB-60 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $0 |