Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photography Glossary Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus 6010 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6010 was unveiled 5 years before the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the 6010 matches up vs the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| 6010 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus 6010
| WG-4 GPS | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 55 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| 6010 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6010 offers outside measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 6010 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the 6010 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 6010 and WG-4 GPS is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 6010 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to produce more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus 6010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-17 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50C | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $210 |