Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 6010 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 6010 was released 7 months after the SL102 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the 6010 scores vs the SL102 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Samsung SL102
| 6010 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 7 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Olympus 6010
| SL102 | 6010 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Samsung SL102
| 6010 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 6010 comes with outside dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the 6010 vs the SL102.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6010 and SL102 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the 6010 and SL102.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus 6010 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The younger 6010 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung SL102 |
| Alternative name | mju Tough 6010 | ES55 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-17 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179g (0.39 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50C | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $130 |
