Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST95
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
99 Imaging
38 Features
19 Overall
30
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus 6010 and Samsung ST95, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 6010 was revealed 18 months earlier than the ST95 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the 6010 grades versus the ST95 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Samsung ST95. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Samsung ST95
| 6010 | ST95 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Olympus 6010
| ST95 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 18 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Samsung ST95
| 6010 | ST95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6010 comes with external measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has dimensions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6010 and Samsung ST95 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the 6010 compared to the ST95.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6010 and ST95 is 94 and 99 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The image below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 6010 and ST95.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST95 to show extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung ST95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung ST95 |
| Other name | mju Tough 6010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-17 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50C | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $145 |