Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
36 Features
45 Overall
39
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 6010 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6010 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the WB210 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the 6010 scores versus the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Samsung WB210
| 6010 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 1k | Sharper screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus 6010
| WB210 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 24 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Samsung WB210
| 6010 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 6010 enjoys physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the 6010 against the WB210.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6010 and WB210 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specifications. The image here may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 6010 and WB210.
Plainly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Samsung WB210 to result in greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung WB210 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-17 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179g (0.39 pounds) | 174g (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50C | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $279 |