Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB250F
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus 6010 versus Samsung WB250F, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 6010 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 6010 was released 4 years prior to the WB250F which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 6010 grades against the WB250F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Samsung WB250F
6010 | WB250F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Olympus 6010
WB250F | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | July 2009 | Newer by 42 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Samsung WB250F
6010 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6010 comes with external dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6010 versus Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the 6010 and the WB250F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6010 and WB250F is 94 and 93 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The image below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6010 and WB250F.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB250F to give you more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged 6010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung WB250F |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-17 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lb) | 226 grams (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50C | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $0 | $250 |