Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB700
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus 6010 versus Samsung WB700, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the 6010 (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe 6010 was introduced 17 months before the WB700 making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the 6010 grades versus the WB700 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Samsung WB700. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Samsung WB700
| 6010 | WB700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus 6010
| WB700 | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2010 | July 2009 | Newer by 17 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Samsung WB700
| 6010 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 6010 offers exterior dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6010 versus Samsung WB700 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the 6010 compared to the WB700.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6010 and WB700 is 94 and 98 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 6010 and WB700.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Samsung WB700 to resolve extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 6010 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung WB700 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-17 | 2010-12-28 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179 gr (0.39 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50C | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $300 |