Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Announced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a complete review of the Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 6010 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB800F which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the 6010 matches up against the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 and Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6010 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Samsung WB800F
| 6010 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus 6010
| WB800F | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months | |
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Samsung WB800F
| 6010 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 6010 offers external measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 6010 versus the WB800F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the 6010 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes merely by checking out technical specs. The image underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 6010 and WB800F.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB800F to produce extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 6010 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-07-17 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 179g (0.39 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50C | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $300 |