Clicky

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus 6010
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Also Known as mju Tough 6010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the 6010 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The 6010 was released 5 years before the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 6010 scores versus the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 6010 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus 6010

 DP2 Quattro 6010 
LaunchedFebruary 2014July 2009More modern by 55 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 6010 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6010 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the 6010 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6010 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 6010 and DP2 Quattro.

As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 6010 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 6010 Portrait photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography info
20
no manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
77
manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus 6010 as a Street photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus 6010
Sports photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
33
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
47
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus 6010 Travel photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography factors
61
weather proofing
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
53
good MP (20 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 6010 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography highlights
35
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse recording
59
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3")
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6010 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
28
decently wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone support
9
no video
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 6010 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus Stylus Tough 6010Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Also called as mju Tough 6010 -
Type Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Released 2009-07-17 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 45mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8
Macro focusing distance 2cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings - no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 179g (0.39 lb) 395g (0.87 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID LI-50C BP-51
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $0 $931