Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the 6010 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.

The 6010 was released 5 years before the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 6010 scores versus the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
6010 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus 6010
DP2 Quattro | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
6010 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6010 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the 6010 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6010 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 6010 and DP2 Quattro.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 6010 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Also called as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-17 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 45mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179g (0.39 lb) | 395g (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50C | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $0 | $931 |