Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the 6010 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) feature totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6010 was announced 7 years prior to the Quattro H and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the 6010 scores versus the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Sigma Quattro H
| 6010 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Olympus 6010
| Quattro H | 6010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 80 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Sigma Quattro H
| 6010 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6010 has outside measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the 6010 versus the Quattro H.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6010 and Quattro H is 94 and 78 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the gap between sensor sizing just by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 6010 and Quattro H.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 6010 with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Sigma Quattro H will offer you more detail with its extra 33 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older 6010 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 6010 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-07-17 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 179 grams (0.39 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50C | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $1,134 |