Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Announced September 2018

Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the 6010 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) feature totally different sensor measurements.

The 6010 was released 10 years prior to the HX99 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 6010 scores vs the HX99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Sony HX99
6010 | HX99 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Olympus 6010
HX99 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 111 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3.00" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Sony HX99
6010 | HX99 |
---|
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 6010 features physical measurements of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Sony HX99 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") along with a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the 6010 against the HX99.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 6010 and HX99 is 94 and 91 respectively.

Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6010 and HX99.
As you have seen, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The 6010 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Sony HX99 will render more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged 6010 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-17 | 2018-09-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.00 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lb) | 242 grams (0.53 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50C | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $469 |