Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX9V
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 6010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Introduced July 2011
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX9V Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus 6010 versus Sony HX9V, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the 6010 (12MP) and HX9V (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 6010 was launched 24 months prior to the HX9V making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the 6010 grades versus the HX9V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX9V Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 6010 Gallery & Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Sony HX9V
6010 | HX9V |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus 6010
HX9V | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | July 2009 | More recent by 24 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6010 and Sony HX9V
6010 | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6010 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Sony HX9V has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus 6010 versus Sony HX9V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the 6010 against the HX9V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 6010 and HX9V is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The photograph below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6010 and HX9V.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sony HX9V to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older 6010 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6010 vs Sony HX9V Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
Other name | mju Tough 6010 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-17 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 179 grams (0.39 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50C | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $328 |