Olympus 6020 vs Olympus 8000
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 6020 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus 6020 and Olympus 8000, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6020 was announced 8 months later than the 8000 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the 6020 grades against the 8000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6020 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus 8000
| 6020 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus 6020
| 8000 | 6020 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Olympus 8000
| 6020 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 offers physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8000 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 6020 and Olympus 8000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the 6020 compared to the 8000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and 8000 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and 8000.
Clearly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus 6020 to show greater detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher 6020 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
| Also called | mju Tough 6020 | mju Tough 8000 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $279 | $380 |