Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
Olympus 6020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 6020
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus TG-320, both Waterproof digital cameras and both of them are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 6020 was introduced 23 months before the TG-320 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the 6020 scores versus the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Olympus TG-320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus TG-320
| 6020 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus 6020
| TG-320 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 23 months |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Olympus TG-320
| 6020 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the 6020 versus the TG-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the 6020 and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The visual below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and TG-320.
To sum up, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-320 to resolve extra detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older 6020 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus 6020 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography features
megapixel count good (13MP)
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
MP count good (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus 6020 Street photography advice
Olympus TG-320 Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than average (122 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competitors (155g)
screen is fixed
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus 6020 Sports photography info
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography info
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (13 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
weather sealing
low fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (150 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Olympus 6020 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography information
lighter than average (122g)
weather sealing
megapixel count good (13MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
lighter than competitors (155g)
environment proofing
MP count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
not so great battery life (150 shots)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Olympus 6020 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (13 megapixels)
weather sealing
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
not so great battery life (150 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging details
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (122g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic jack
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not feature selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) | 155 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $279 | $0 |