Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VR-330
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus 6020 and Olympus VR-330, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 6020 was introduced 12 months earlier than the VR-330 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the 6020 matches up against the VR-330 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Olympus VR-330. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus VR-330
| 6020 | VR-330 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus 6020
| VR-330 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Olympus VR-330
| 6020 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 comes with physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus 6020 and Olympus VR-330 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the 6020 against the VR-330.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and VR-330 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The picture here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and VR-330.
To sum up, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus VR-330 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 158g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $279 | $220 |