Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-1
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus XZ-1, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") feature different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 6020 was revealed 11 months prior to the XZ-1 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 6020 scores versus the XZ-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Olympus XZ-1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus XZ-1
6020 | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus 6020
XZ-1 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | February 2010 | More modern by 11 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Olympus XZ-1
6020 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 6020 provides exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the 6020 and the XZ-1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and XZ-1 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing technical specs. The picture below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 6020 and XZ-1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 6020 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus 6020 will render extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 grams (0.27 lb) | 275 grams (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $279 | $567 |