Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly close but the 6020 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The 6020 was announced 3 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the 6020 matches up versus the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
6020 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus 6020
XZ-2 iHS | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 35 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
6020 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 6020 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the 6020 vs the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5ea9/c5ea9a56bab8e4fe0d79d62b37bcb14fd878d5aa" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bc61/6bc61ae47e5eac1bb1d8d25488c18329be319860" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the 6020 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 6020 having a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus 6020 will result in greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/798b9/798b9a46668edc2e89a618b95338d2e0dbcbbcdd" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1d24/e1d2476f8d9f4b0d40730f017f67b1bdaad56fb6" alt="Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 6020 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Also called | mju Tough 6020 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122g (0.27 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $279 | $450 |