Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") provide different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 6020 was introduced 9 years before the ZS200 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the 6020 matches up against the ZS200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic ZS200
6020 | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus 6020
ZS200 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | February 2010 | More modern by 97 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 230k | Crisper display (+1010k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic ZS200
6020 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 comes with external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has measurements of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the 6020 against the ZS200.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and ZS200 is 95 and 86 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through a spec sheet. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and ZS200.
As you can see, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 6020 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide more detail using its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged 6020 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 6020 | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2018-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 122 gr (0.27 pounds) | 340 gr (0.75 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $279 | $800 |