Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FS7
95 Imaging
35 Features
32 Overall
33
95 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FS7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 139g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FS7 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic FS7, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the 6020 (13MP) and FS7 (10MP) and the 6020 (1/2.3") and FS7 (1/2.5") offer different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 6020 was brought out 13 months later than the FS7 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS7 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the 6020 matches up versus the FS7 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FS7 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 6020 Gallery & Panasonic FS7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic FS7
| 6020 | FS7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 | January 2009 | Fresher by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS7 over the Olympus 6020
| FS7 | 6020 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic FS7
| 6020 | FS7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FS7 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 6020 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Panasonic FS7 has measurements of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") along with a weight of 139 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic FS7 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 6020 and the FS7.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 6020 and FS7 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FS7 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and FS7.
As you can see, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 6020 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus 6020 will provide greater detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger 6020 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FS7 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FS7 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS7 |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 6020 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2009-01-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 139 grams (0.31 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $279 | $160 |