Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Photography Glossary Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 6020 (13MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is very similar and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 6020 was brought out 3 months prior to the FX75 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the 6020 grades vs the FX75 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 6020 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Panasonic FX75
| 6020 | FX75 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus 6020
| FX75 | 6020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 6020 and Panasonic FX75
| 6020 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | June 2010 | Similar generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 6020 provides outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the 6020 versus the FX75.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 6020 and FX75 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The picture here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 6020 and FX75.
Plainly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Panasonic FX75 to offer you greater detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus 6020 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 6020 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 7.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) | 165 grams (0.36 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $279 | $139 |
